12/28/2007
Here’s General Petraeus’s year end letter to the troops serving in Iraq.
28 December 2007
Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, and Civilians of Multi-National Force-Iraq:
As 2007 draws to a close, you should look back with pride on what you, your fellow troopers, our Iraqi partners, and Iraqi Coalition civilians have achieved in 2007. A year ago, Iraq was racked by horrific violence and on the brink of civil war. Now, levels of violence and civilians and military casualties are significantly reduced and hope has been rekindled in many Iraqi communities. To be sure, the progress is reversible and there is much more to be done. Nonetheless, the hard-fought accomplishments of 2007 have been substantial, and I want to thank each of you for the contributions you made to them.
In response to the challenges that faced Iraq a year ago, we and our Iraqi partners adopted a new approach. We increased our focus on securing the Iraqi people and, in some cases, delayed transition of tasks to Iraqi forces. Additional U.S. and Georgian forces were deployed to theater, the tours of U.S. unites were extended, and Iraqi forces conducted a surge of their own, generating well over 100,000 more Iraqi police and soldiers during the year so that they, too, had additional forces to execute the new approach. In places like Ramadi, Baqubah, Arab Jabour, and Baghdad, you and our Iraqi brothers fought—often house by house, block by block, and neighborhood by neighborhood—to wrest sanctuaries away from Al Qaeda-Iraq, to disrupt extremist militia elements, and to rid the streets of mafia-like criminals. Having cleared areas, you worked with Iraqis to retain them—establishing outposts in the areas we were securing, developing Iraqi Security Forces, and empowering locals to help our efforts. This approach has not been easy. It has required steadfastness in the conduct of tough offensive operations, creative solutions to the myriad problems on the ground, and persistence over the course of many months and during countless trying situations. Through it all, you have proven equal to every task, continually demonstrating an impressive ability to conduct combat and stability operations in an exceedingly complex environment.
Your accomplishments have given the Iraqi people new confidence and prompted many citizens to reject terror and confront those who practice it. As the months passed in 2007, in fact, the tribal awakening that began in Al Anbar Province spread to other parts of the country. Emboldened by improving security and tired of indiscriminate violence, extremist ideology, oppressive practices, and criminal activity, Iraqis increasingly rejected Al Qaeda-Iraq and rogue militia elements. Over time, the desire of Iraqis to contribute to their own security has manifested itself in citizens volunteering for the police, the Army, and concerned local citizen programs. It has been reflected in citizens providing information that has helped us find far more than double the number of arms and weapons caches we found last year. And it has been apparent in Iraqi communities now supporting their local security forces.
As a result of your hard work and that of our Iraqi comrades-in-arms—and with the support of the local populace in many areas—we have seen significant improvements in the security situation. The number of attacks per week is down some 60 percent from a peak in June of this year to a level last seen consistently in the early summer of 2005. With fewer attacks, we are also seeing significantly reduced loss of life. The number of civilian deaths is down by some 75 percent since its height a year ago, dropping to a level not seen since the beginning of 2006. And the number of Coalition losses is down substantially as well. We remain mindful that the past year’s progress has been purchased through the sacrifice and selfless service of all those involved and that the new Iraq must still contend with innumerable enemies and obstacles. Al Qaeda-Iraq has been significantly degraded, but it remains capable of horrific bombings. Militia extremists have been disrupted, but they retain influence in many areas. Criminals have been apprehended, but far too many still roam Iraqi streets and intimidate local citizens and Iraqi officials. We and our Iraqi partners will have to deal with each of these challenges in the New Year to keep the situation headed in the right direction.
While the progress in a number of areas is fragile, the security improvements have significantly changed the situation in many parts of Iraq. It is now imperative that we take advantage of these improvements by looking beyond the security arena and helping Iraqi military and political leaders as they develop solutions in other areas as well, solutions they can sustain over time. At the tactical level, this means an increasing focus on helping not just Iraqi Security Forces—with whom we must partner in all that we do—but also helping Iraqi governmental organizations as they endeavor to restore basic services, to create employment opportunities, to revitalize local markets, to refurbish schools, to spur local economic activity, and to keep locals involved in contributing to local security. We will have to do all of this, of course, while continuing to draw down our forces, thinning our presence, and gradually handing over responsibilities to our Iraqi partners. Meanwhile, at the national level, we will focus on helping the Iraqi Government integrate local volunteers into the Iraqi Security Forces and other employment, develop greater ministerial capacity and capability, aid displaced persons as they return, and, most importantly, take the all-important political and economic actions needed to exploit the opportunity provided by the gains in the security arena.
The pace of progress on important political actions to this point has been slower than Iraqi leaders had hoped. Still, there have been some important steps taken in recent months. Iraq’s leaders reached agreement on the Declaration of Principles for Friendship and Cooperation with the United States, which lays the groundwork for an enduring relationship between our nations. The United Nations Security Council approved Iraq’s request for a final renewal of the resolution that authorizes the Coalition to operate in Iraq. Iraq’s leaders passed an important Pension Law that not only extends retirement benefits to Iraqis previously left out but also represents the first of what we hope will be additional measures fostering national reconciliation. And Iraq’s leaders have debated at length a second reconciliation-related measure, the Accountability and Justice Bill (the de-Ba’athification Reform Law), as well as the 2008 National Budget, both which likely will be brought up for a vote in early 2008. Even so, all Iraqi participants recognize that much more must be done politically to put their country on an irreversible trajectory to national reconciliation and sustainable economic development. We will, needless to say, work closely with our Embassy teammates to support the Iraq Government as it strives to take advantage of the improved security environment by pursing political and economic progress.
The New Year will bring many changes. Substantial force rotations and adjustments already underway will continue. One Army brigade combat team and a Marine Expeditionary Unit have already redeployed without replacement. In the coming months, four additional brigades and two Marine battalions will follow suit. Throughout that time, we will continue to adapt to the security situation as it evolves. And in the midst of all the changes, we and our Iraqi partners will strive to maintain the momentum, to press the fight, and to pursue Iraq’s enemies relentlessly. Solutions to many of the tough problems will continue to be found at your level, together with local Iraqi leaders and with your Iraqi Security Force partners, in company and battalion areas of operation and in individual neighborhoods an towns. As you and your Iraqi partners turn concepts into reality, additional progress will emerge slowly and fitfully. Over time, we will gradually see fewer bad days and accumulate more good days, good weeks, and good months.
The way ahead will not be easy. Inevitably, there will be more tough days and tough weeks. Unforeseen challenges will emerge. And success will require continued hard work, commitment, and initiative from all involved. As we look to the future, however, we should remember how far we have come in the past year. Thanks to the tireless efforts and courageous actions of the Iraqi people, Iraq’s political and military leaders, the Iraqi Security Forces, and each of you, a great deal has been achieved in 2007. Thus, as we enter a new year, we and our Iraqi partners will have important accomplishments and a newfound sense of hope on which we can build.
As always, all or your leaders, our fellow citizens back home, and I deeply appreciate the dedication, professionalism, commitment, and courage you display on a daily basis. It remains the greatest of honors to serve with each of you in this critical endeavor.
Sincerely,
David H. Petraeus
The soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines serving in Iraq should indeed be proud of all they’ve accomplished this year. There have been great strides made in Iraq in the last twelve months. I expect that gains will continue to be made in the coming months.
Hat Tip: Black Five, Hugh Hewitt
12/27/2007
Opposition leader Benizir Bhutto has been assasinated. Reports are that she was killed in the gun attack that preceded the bomb that exploded during a rally. It will be interesting to see what this means for our efforts in the war on terror in the region. This situation is very fluid right now, I’ll update as new details become available.
12/24/2007
Can We Count On This Report Stopping Iran?
CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) has released a hypothetical report stating that in a nuclear war with Israel between 16 and 20 million Iranians would lose their lives compared to roughly 200,000 — 800,000 Israelis. Iran would likely cease to exist as a nation, and Israel would take a serious hit.
The question is; is this enough to make the mullahs and Ahmadinejad think twice about going after Israel? I don’t think it is. The mullahs in Iran, and Ahmadinejad believe that 1.) a nuclear war with Israel will bring back the twelfth imam, and 2.) that their religion (Islam) mandates that they eliminate Israel. The crazies in Iran believe that these deaths will further their cause, so there’s no reason to believe that losing between 16–20 million of their citizens will slow them down one bit.
During the coldwar with the former USSR we could count on reasonable heads to prevail because in a war with the USSR their was a knowledge of mutually assured destruction. Neither side wanted to lose their entire country. With the crazies in Iran we have no such assurance of sanity.
Regardless, these paragraphs don’t sit well with me. One thing is for sure, a war between Israel and Iran would be ugly. This is why we simply cannot allow Iran to get nuclear weapons.
If a nuclear war between Israel and Iran were to break out 16-20 million Iranians would lose their lives - as opposed to 200,000-800,000 Israelis, according to a report recently published by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), which is headed by Anthony H. Cordesman, formerly an analyst for the US Department of Defense. The document, which is largely theoretical due to the lack of verified knowledge in some areas - specifically in terms of Israel’s nuclear capability - paints various scenarios and attempts to predict the strategies of regional powers, as well as the US.
The report assesses that a nuclear war would last approximately three weeks and ultimately end with the annihilation of Iran, due to Israel’s alleged possession of weapons with a far larger yield. Israel, according to the assessment, would have a larger chance of survival. The report does not attempt to predict how many deaths would eventually be caused by possible nuclear fallout.
Another scenario laid out in the report shows Syria joining Iran against Israel:
Another scenario presented by the report includes Syria joining the bandwagon in case of a war and lobbing missiles with chemical and biological warheads into Israeli cities. According to the report, up to 800,000 Israelis would be killed if that were to happen. Syria, however, would be forced to grapple with the deaths of approximately 18 million of its citizens were Israel to respond with its nuclear arsenal.
Here is a link where you can download the PDF version of the report.
12/22/2007
Hillary has put out a Christmas TV ad depicting campaign promises as Christmas presents. One thing that’s never asked of the Democrats is “how do you plan on paying for all of this?”, and what many Democrat voters don’t realize is that they are the ones that end up paying for these entitlement programs. That’s why ads like these are so troubling.
Watch your wallets…
12/21/2007
The Danger Of A Huckabee Nomination
Opinionjournal.com’s Kimberly Strassel has a great piece about the danger of a Mike Huckabee nomination. Her main point is that Huckabee is a ticking time bomb for the GOP.
Huckabee has proven to be naive in the arena of foreign affairs, moderate to liberal on domestic policy, and it is becoming more and more apparent that he may be ethically challenged as well.
Mr. Huckabee is starting to get a look-see by the press, though whether the nation will have time to absorb the findings before the primaries is just as unknown. The small amount that has been unearthed so far ought to have primary voters nervous. It isn’t just that Mr. Huckabee is far from a traditional conservative; he’s a potential ethical time bomb.
On policy, Mr. Huckabee’s tenure in Arkansas has shown him to be ambivalent about tax increases, variously supporting sales tax hikes, cigarette and gasoline taxes and Internet taxes. Spending increased 65% from 1996 to 2004, three times the rate of inflation.
He’s so lackluster on education reform that he recently received an endorsement from the New Hampshire affiliate of the National Education Association–the first ever of a GOP candidate. The union cited Mr. Huckabee’s opposition to school vouchers. Mr. Huckabee is a fan of greater subsidies for farmers and “clean energy.” He’s proven himself a political neophyte on foreign policy, joining Democrats to skewer President Bush and glorify the “diplomacy, diplomacy, diplomacy” line.
Most of this is out there, thoroughly documented, and even now slowly filtering its way to voters. Of more concern is what has not yet been discovered about Mr. Huckabee’s time as Arkansas lieutenant governor and governor, in particular on ethical issues. There are signs that Mr. Huckabee’s background–borne of the same Arkansas establishment that produced Bill Clinton–is ripe to provide the sort of pop-up political scandal that could derail a general election campaign.
As they say… read the whole thing.
12/19/2007
Time Magazine has apparently named Vladimir Putin as its person of the year. Putin has imprisoned his political opponents, he has squelched freedom of speech and free press, and there have been several suspicious murders tied to his reign. Putin is a thug, and there’s no way he should have gotten the honor of person of the year. Hey Time, here’s a suggestion for you. How about naming someone who has done something to further the cause of freedom… like General David Petraeus, or the American Military. Â
12/18/2007
Reid Gives Another Propaganda Boost To Al Qaeda
Harry Reid just doesn’t know when to keep his mouth shut. He’s still trying to live down his declaration of defeat on the Senate floor earlier this year, but has decided to double down on his declarations of defeat. From Politico.com:
Indeed, Republicans have gotten their way in the battle over spending, have forced Democrats to jettison rollbacks of tax breaks for oil companies, and have beaten back attempts to pay for expanded children’s health care programs with a tobacco tax increase. Even though they’re in the minority, the GOP, backed by President Bush, has used the filibuster to block Democratic priorities over and over this fall.
“Who’s winning?” Reid asked a group of reporters. “Big Oil, Big Tobacco. … Al Qaeda has regrouped and is able to fight a civil war in Iraq. … The American people are losing.”
This is pure nonsense. Even the MSM has given up on this particular brand of bull. The Petraeus surge, and the hard work of our troops have made an amazing difference in Iraq. Al Qaeda in Iraq has been driven to the brink of destruction. In fact, many of them have fled back to Pakistan. The thing is, I don’t think Reid actually believes this. I think he’s saying this to pander to the anti-war nutroots, and to continue to try to damage the President. Harry and the Democrats can’t stand for the President to have any success’s, and they will do whatever they deem necessary to keep him from having any even if it means damaging our country and our efforts in the GWOT.
Hat Tip: Captain’s Quarters
12/16/2007
Mitt Romney sat down with Tim Russert today on Meet The Press and gave an impressive showing. I think the highlight of the interview was their discussion of faith and morality and how it plays such a vital part in our freedom and the founding of our country.
12/15/2007
More On The Attacks Planned From Prison
Yesterday I posted about the Islamofacists who had planned on attacking sites in southern California, and how these attacks were planned from and members recruited from behind bars. Powerline points to a couple of articles in the LA Times that go into a lot more detail about the plans these guys had made [here and here]. They were closer to going active than anyone since 9/11.
In addition to the military sites and synagogues, the document listed LAX and the Israeli Consulate as potential targets.
Moreover, Staples said, “they were discussing dates such as Yom Kippur” and Sept. 11, “which was literally two months off from when they were arrested,” he said. “So from their conversations and the notes they wrote to one another, it was clear they were ready to act within a few months.”
LAPD Deputy Chief Michael Downing, who oversaw his department’s role in the investigation, offered this blunt assessment:
“This cell was closer to going operational at the time than anyone since 9/11.”
The feds and California officials also released some of the documentsfound in the prison cells of the would be terrorists. These guys posed a real and immediate threat, and they were caught because of leads found during a routine probe into a gas station holdup in Torrance California a suburb of Los Angeles.
Law enforcement answered one obvious question during a press conference; does this group still pose a threat?
Asked at the news conference whether JIS had other members at large or remained a threat, Staples offered a quick response.
“No,” he said. “They’re out of business.”
Like the gents at Powerline, somehow I’m still not very reassured.
Joe Vento, owner of Geno’s steaks in south Philly posted a sign in his shop back in 2005 that says “This is America, when ordering please speak english”. The Philadelphia city council has been after him about the sign for quite awhile. Now the city’s human rights commission has jumped into the fray. Last night, they held an hours long meeting to try to force Joe to take down his sign under the guise that the sign is discriminitory. This is one of the most ridiculous statements I’ve ever read. It comes from one of the attorneys for the commission.
Paul M. Hummer, an attorney for the commission, testified earlier that the sign is not about political speech, but about “intimidation,” and that it suggested business from certain individuals was not wanted.
This is not about intimidation, and those that want to buy a steak sandwich from Joe are welcome to do so. All they need to do is order in english. We ask people who eat at resturants to wear shoes and shirts. Is that discrimination? Some resturants have a dress code of sorts. You need to wear a suit or dress to eat there. Is that discrimination? Our society has said no on both accounts. This is no different.
Theodore Roosevelt once said (I’m paraphrasing here) “To be an American, you have to be American and nothing else. For if you say you’re something else, then you’re not a true Americanâ€. Roosevelt was mking two points I believe. First and foremost, as an American there’s room for only one allegience. You must be loyal to America. Second, being loyal to America, you need to be able to fit in here. Part of fitting in is being able to speak our common language. We have a big problem in America. Many immigrants — especially illegal immigrants — are not making an effort to join society. They’re not making an effort to assimilate. While we are working to secure our borders, we need to do something to solve the assimilation problem as well. I think Joe Vento’s sign is a step in the right direction.
12/14/2007
Radical Islamists Plot Attacks From Prison
Two California ex-convicts plead guilty today to seditious conspiracy charges. The had planned to attack military sites here in the US. These plans were made from behind bars.
LOS ANGELES — Two men accused of plotting behind prison walls to launch attacks on military sites, synagogues and other targets in 2005 pleaded guilty Friday to conspiring to wage war against the United States.
Kevin James, 31, and Levar Haley Washington, 28, both pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy charges. Washington also pleaded guilty to using a firearm to further that conspiracy.
Authorities say James, Washington and two others were part of a California prison gang cell of radical Muslims planning attacks in the Los Angeles area. Prosecutors say James even had a press release prepared to send out after an attack.
So, our prisons are being used to not only recruit terrorists, but to plan attacks against the United States. This is but one reason why allowing those being kept at Guantanamo bay into our prison systems would be foolish.
It would give them access to people who are already there because they are criminals, so would probably have no problem commiting another crime, or assisting in planning or commiting a terrorist attack. It would give them access to people who would have no problem commiting a murder — or several thousand murders.
It also gives them access to rights that — as enemy combatants or prisoners of war — they have no right to have. Not to mention the fact that most of them aren’t US citizens, and as such have no rights as a citizen of the US. At least, not the same as we do as citizens.
Furthermore, I don’t want some defense lawyer who’s trying to make a name for himself off the publicity from the trial getting these scumbags off the hook for plotting to kill, or killing US citizens.
One last snort-worthy comment from James:
“This incident is the first in a series of incidents to come in a plight to defend and propagate traditional Islam in its purity,” James is accused of writing. “We are not extremists, radicals or terrorists. We are only servants of Allah.” [emphasis added — Jim C]
Not extremists, radicals, or terrorists… yeah, okay, whatever.
Exit question: How long before CAIR or the ACLU steps up to defend these terrorists?
12/13/2007
The Democrats can’t seem to get anything done for the good of the country. They certainly can’t seem to get anything done for the good of our troops.
But, they have managed to toss the nutroots a bone. Lawmakers have voted to hold a couple of close Bush aids in contempt for refusing to comply with subpoenas issued in the US Attorney firings.
On a largely party-line vote, the Democratic-led panel sent contempt of Congress citations against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove to the full Senate for consideration.
“This is not a step I have wanted to take,” said Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. He accused the White House of “stonewalling” and refusing to reach an acceptable compromise on providing documents and testimony.
In a battle dating back to shortly after Democrats took control of Congress in January, Bush has claimed executive privilege to protect aides from complying with subpoenas demanding documents and testimony in a congressional probe into the firing last year of nine federal prosecutors.
Leahy and the rest of the Democrats have wanted nothing more than to do exactlythis since President took office. For Leahy to claim that this is a step that he didn’t want to take is disingenuous to say the least.
Just for the heck of it, here’s Leahy on Executive priviledge during the Clinton years.
To add insult to injury, a couple of infamous RINO’s decided to join in helping the Democrats deliver for the nutroots. Arlen Specter and Charles Grassley voted along with Leahy. Here’s what Specter had to say about the vote.
Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, the top Republican on the committee, voted in favor of the contempt citations against his better wishes.
“It is a vote that I would prefer not to make,†Specter said at the committee hearing. “It is a vote that I will make with reluctance, but I will do so because I think it is necessary for the Congress to demonstrate our determination on Congressional oversight that it involves some very important, substantive programs.â€
I suspect in the case of Specter and Grassley this had more to do with preserving the power of the Legislative over the Executive when it comes to stuff like this. These self important fools don’t like being told no by anyone.
12/11/2007
“Huckabee Is The Republican’s Glass Jaw”
I’ve been wondering why the Democrats haven’t attacked Mike Huckabee lately. According to a Drudge story, it’s because they see Huckabee as being our glass jaw… our McGovern.
Democrat party officials are avoiding any and all criticism of Republican presidential contender Mike Huckabee, insiders reveal.
The Democratic National Committee has told staffers to hold all fire, until he secures the party’s nomination.
The directive has come down from the highest levels within the party, according to a top source.
Within the DNC, Huckabee is known as the “glass jaw — and they’re just waiting to break it.”
In the last three weeks since Huckabee’s surge kicked in, the DNC hasn’t released a single press release criticizing his rising candidacy.
The last DNC press release critical of Huckabee appeared back on March 2nd.
Mike Huckabee has several problems. Some of his biggest problems are with the base. He’s out of touch with the base on illegal immigration and many other issues. Now, if Huckabee were to get the nomination, it’s possible that there are many other issues that he’ll be out of touch with America on as well. Right now, I’m more focused on nominating a candidate that most closely reflects the views and ideals of Republicans. I feel right now that the two candidates that most closely fit that bill are Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson. Unfortunately, Fred’s campaign seems to have stalled.
12/9/2007
Ok, I’m going to a new post because details are sketchy and the previous post will get too long. Details are sketchy right now, and things are breaking so fast that I can’t seem to find links for all of the details being reported. FOX News is reporting that there is possibly a car with explosives involved in the Colorado Springs shooting. They are reporting that an IED has been found. They are also reporting that the gunman (possibly two gunmen) was wearing a bullet proof vest. One thing we do know for sure is that one gunman has been “detained” in the Colorado Springs shooting.
More details as they become available.
UPDATE: KUSA — the NBC affiliate — is reporting that authorities are saying the Colorado Springs shooter has been shot and is in custody. Authorities have also found an IED. The KUSA report doesn’t say where the IED was found. I’ve heard two different reports. One said that it was found in a vehicle tied to the shooter, the other said that it was found in the church.
COLORADO SPRINGS – Authorities say four people, including a gunman, were shot on Sunday in the second shooting of the day at a Colorado religious center.
The gunfire erupted at the 10,000-plus member mega-church, New Life Church, just after 1 p.m., according to authorities.
KOAA says the gunman opened fire at the New Life Church, located at 11025 Voyager Parkway in Colorado Springs, as the 12 p.m. service was getting out. Authorities say the shooting occurred outside of the church.
A 9NEWS source has confirmed the gunman was shot and killed by a security guard. Authorities also found an improvised explosive device.
Authorities have not confirmed that the suspect is dead. They say they have one person in custody. Police are not releasing any information about what kind of weapon was used in the attack or the suspect’s status. 9NEWS has learned the gunman was dressed with a tactical helmet and body armor.
Colorado Springs PD is holding a presser right now. More details as they become available.
UPDATE: It was released last night that the “IED’s” found at the Colorado Springs shooting were smoke generating devices. In other words, they were smoke bombs.
Unbelievable. I woke up this morning to find out that four people were shot over night at a Christian Missionary training center less than five minutes from my house.
The suspect hasn’t been caught yet. He’s been described as a young white male possibly with a beard. He was wearing a black skull cap or beanie. No motive has been discovered yet… At least not that the police have released yet. More information as it becomes available.
UPDATE: The shooter was looking for a place to stay for the night. One of the staffers told the man that they couldn’t put him up for the night. When told that he couldn’t stay there for the night, the man opened fire. Two of the four victims are now dead, one of the two surviving victims is in critical condition.
Warren said the group was just finishing a Christmas banquet when the shooter entered the facility and asked staffer Tiffany Johnson if he could be housed for the evening. When Johnson told the man that they could not provide him with a place to stay, he opened fire, Warren said.
Warren said he did not think the victims knew the gunman, but that the campus was open to the public for worship services.
UPDATE: Another shooting outside of a church in Colorado Springs. FOX News is reporting that the Colorado Springs shooter matches the same description as the shooter in Arvada. Four more people are shot. For those that remember the preacher Ted Haggard who was brought down by a gay escort, the church in Colorado Springs is the same church he used to pastor before the scandal.
12/7/2007
Mitt Romney gave one of the best speeches on the place of religtion in the public square that I’ve ever heard today. He emphasized that religion played an important part in the founding of our nation, and stressed that our freedom comes not from the government, but from our creator. It’s because of that that religious freedom is vital to the survival of our country.
Romney also stressed that no church leadership will ever dictate our nation’s policies if he were elected to office. This is as it should be. Our founders set up a system where there would be no state sponsored religion. A system where everyone is free to worship as they please.
Below is the text of the speech. I would urge my fellow Christians to read this speech, and give it some thought. Remember, we are not electing a pastor. We’re electing a President. While I don’t agree with him on matters of theology, Mitt Romney is someone that I could be very comfortable with as my President.
12/3/2007
The Problem With Retired Brig. Gen. Keith Kerr’s Question
Kerr was the Hillary plant at the Republican Youtube debate the other night. I want to start by thanking Brig. Gen. Kerr for his service to his country. That being said, I think his comments the other night on don’t ask don’t tell are off base.
Kerr believes that don’t ask don’t tell is adversely effecting military readiness. His basis for making these claims is that those men and women who come out of the closet are being kicked out of the military. This, of course, is a bad thing during a time of war.
Kerr’s claims ignore the simple fact that if these men and women want to stay in the military they need only do one simple thing; keep their mouths shut about their bedroom habits and sexual preferences. Why should they have to? It’s real simple; you’re in the military to serve your country, not to make a political statement about whether or not gays should be able to serve openly.
12/2/2007
Foer Finally Admits What The Rest Of Us Knew Months Ago…
TNR’s Franklin Foer took fourteen pages to finally get around to admitting what the rest of us knew months ago. Namely, that Beauchamp’s stories were fabrications. There’s a lot of self serving BS and half truths mixed in as well, but here’s the punch line:
When I last spoke with Beauchamp in early November, he continued to stand by his stories. Unfortunately, the standards of this magazine require more than that. And, in light of the evidence available to us, after months of intensive re-reporting, we cannot be confident that the events in his pieces occurred in exactly the manner that he described them. Without that essential confidence, we cannot stand by these stories.
Andrew Sullivan continues to stand by his buddy Foer saying of his investigation “But Frank’s painfully extensive re-reporting and final conclusion are not the work of someone ducking editorial responsibility or accountability”.
Unfortunately, as Karl at Protein Wisdom points out, Foer’s “painfully extensive re-reporting” is full of half truths, unanswered questions, and contradictions.
Reaction in the real reality based community is pretty universal; TNR published Beauchamp’s stories because they fit the magazine’s narrative, Foer and company have been ducking accountability for months, and Foer — at a minimum — should be fired. Here’s a roundup:
Michelle Malkin has a good roundup, and spot on analysis
Patterico thinks we may just be starting to see the fallout
Bob Owens, who has been on this one from the beginning
Allah and Bryan have more
Glenn makes a fitting octapus reference
Powerline calls it the Fog of Foer
Dan Riehl wants to know why the smear on Matt Sanchez
Q and O says Foer pulled the eject handle










