Contact Me



Policies

Comment Policy

Blogroll Thinking Right

Blogroll Me!

Search This Site








My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!

Day By Day



Thinking Right Poll

Recent Posts

Project: Letters from Home 2.0 Update
Prayers
Project Letters from Home II
Obama’s Clueless On Energy Policy
Obama, Ayers, and Wright
Another Dem Plant
Terrorists On The Loose
Damage Control
Bear With Me…
The Temper Tantrum On The Left


News/Weather

Fox News
World Net Daily
CNN
NY Times
The Denver Post
Google News
Accu Weather
The Weather Channel
NOAA Radar

Rocky Mountain Alliance

Best Destiny
Clay Calhoun
Kopel's Corner
Geezerville USA
Exultate Justi
Exvigilare
Mount Virtus
Mangled Cat
The Daily Blogster
The American Kestrel
View From A Height

Friends of the Alliance

Daily Reading

ToTheRight.org
Conservative Oasis
Addiction Overcome
Copious Dissent
Hugh Hewitt
Arthur's Hall
Radio Blogger
Mile High Rev
Pools Of Grace
Stop The ACLU
Riehl World View
LILEKS
LaShawn Barber
Michelle Malkin
Instapundit
Michael Yon
JusticeSoldier.com
An American Soldier
The Corner
Captains Quarters
Power Line
SCSU Scholars
Fraters Libertas
Infinite Monkeys



Blog Roll

Lonestar Pundit
Hope From The Word
In The Agora
Dilley Blog
The Truckin Blog
Less People Less Idiots
Right Voices
Speed of Thought
Little Red Blog
Oh, That Liberal Media
Neptunus Lex
Evangelical Outpost
My GBS blog
Black Five
Avery Tooley
Contemprary Conservative
Fort Collins Insider

Views From The Left

Andrew Sullivan
Crooks and Nannies
The New Patriot
The Lionhearted Liberal
Talking Points Memo

Old West Art

Michael Boyett Studios

Category Archives

9/11 (6)
ACLU (3)
Activist Judges (2)
Afghanistan (13)
Blogging (66)
CAIR (1)
Colorado Politics (21)
Democratic Primary (14)
Democrats in power (41)
Fairness Doctrine (1)
Faith (23)
General (447)
GWOT (253)
Immigration Reform (21)
Iran (9)
Iraq (148)
It's The Economy Stupid (5)
Katrina (1)
Media (67)
Media Bias (107)
Military (111)
My Illness (22)
National Security (44)
On the border (10)
Plame / Libby (4)
Politics (228)
Politics Of The Far Left (149)
Project: "Letters from Home" (12)
Radical Islam (13)
Republican Primary (16)
Rocky Mountain Alliance (10)
Spreading Freedom (13)
The UN (1)
Thinking Right Radio (3)
Weather (1)
World Affairs (23)
You Decide '08 (42)
Your Tax Dollars At Work (9)


Archives

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003


Currently Reading









Blog Stuff













Blogarama - The Blog Directory





Blog Directory & Search engine

Listed on Blogwise




RSS Feeds

RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Add to Google

Credits

Design by:
E.Webscapes
Powered by:
WordPress v.2.1.3
Hosted by:
Blogs About




7/31/2007

Sullivan Steps In It Again

Dean points out Andrew Sullivan’s dishonesty regarding General Petraeus. Here’s Sullivan’s take on Petraeus on July 18th:

“Petraeus is either willing to be used by the Republican propaganda machine or he is part of the Republican propaganda machine. I’m beginning to suspect the latter. The only thing worse than a deeply politicized and partisan war is a deeply politicized and partisan commander. But we now know whose side Petraeus seems to be on: Cheney’s. Expect spin, not truth, in September.”

Now, the following passage is from Sullivan’s post today:

“There’s been no ’smearing’ of David Petraeus, so far as I can see.”

Ahh, no smearing of General Petraeus so far as he can see. Huh, Sullivan must have a different take on what constitutes a smear. Because, to me, calling the commanding general in Iraq a partisan hack is a smear.

Of course, none of this is really surprising. The two most self important bloggers on the left, Glenn Greenwald and Andrew Sullivan, have been on a Petraeus bashing tear ever since he gave an interview to Hugh Hewitt on air. You can find the transcript of that interview here by the way.

7/29/2007

They Deserve It!

Good for Iraq, they certainly deserve this bit of good news. Today their national soccer team beat Saudi Arabia 1-0 to win the Asian Cup final. Michelle has a round up of the rare moment of national unity, and Iraq the Model is celebrating.

Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin


Filed under: Iraq — Jim @ 15:38
2 Comments »

7/28/2007

Executive Privilege and Pat Leahy

Captain Ed over at Captain’s Quarters took part in a blogger conference call with the White House yesterday. He’s got a real interesting post up that covers the White House’s position real well. But, I think the most interesting part of the whole post is an analysis he found via a Google search. This analysis matches the White Houses opinion exactly, and it was written eight years ago by a respected member of the judiciary committee.

Most importantly, compelling compliance with a congressional subpoena in this context would be difficult. The civil contempt mechanism normally available to Congress, see 28 U.S.C. § 1365, specifically exempts subpoenas to the executive branch. The criminal contempt mechanism, see 2 U.S.C. § 192, which punishes as a misdemeanor a refusal to testify or produce documents to Congress, requires a referral to the Justice Department, which is not likely to pursue compliance in the likely event that the President asserts executive privilege in response to the request for certain documents or testimony. Thus, the only legal way to enforce this subpoena would be to hold a witness in contempt using its “inherent contempt authority,” but this would require a contempt trial on the floor of the Senate. …

Executive privilege is used by the President and the executive branch to shield presidential communications, advice, and national security information from disclosure in judicial proceedings, congressional investigations and other arenas. While the proper scope of executive privilege is the subject of much debate, at a minimum, it covers presidential communications, and may also protect the decision-making, or deliberative process, of the executive branch in general.

Courts have recognized a “presumptive privilege” for presidential communications that is grounded in “a President’s generalized interest in confidentiality” and is viewed as important to preserving the candor of presidential advisors and protecting the freedom of the president and his advisors to “explore alternatives in the process of shaping policies and making decisions and to do so in a way many would be unwilling to express except privately.” U. S. v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 708, 711 (1974); In re Sealed Case, 121 F.3d 729, 743 (D.C. Cir. 1997). This privilege is “inextricably rooted in the separation of powers under the Constitution” and “flow[s] from the nature of enumerated powers” of the President. Id., 418 U.S. at 705; 121 F.3d at 743.

That respected member of the judiciary committee? Pat Leahy… The Democrats don’t have a chance of winning this fight, especially when their guy was making the same exact argument eight years ago.

Hat Tip: Captain’s Quarters


Filed under: Democrats in power, Politics — Jim @ 06:29
2 Comments »

7/24/2007

Yeah Right, They Support The Troops…

I apologize in advance for this excerable piece of trash. But, the lunacy of the left needs to be exposed. The left has said for years that they “support our troops”. I’ve said all along that that’s a bunch of bull. You cannot support our troops, and then do everything in your power to undermine their leaders and their mission. Really, as an example, how would it sound to say something to the effect of I support the Denver Broncos, but I don’t want them to win any of their games?

Well, Daily Kos diarist and former SNL cast member A. Whitney Brown has posted a diary explaining exactly what he means by “I support the troops”.

…But do I still support the individual men and women who have given so much to serve their country? No. I think they’re a bunch of idiots. I also think they’re morally retarded. Because they sign a contract that says they will kill whoever you tell me to kill. And that is morally retarded…

As if the written version wasn’t bad enough, he’s helpfully provided a video version to go along with it.


Filed under: Iraq, Military, Politics Of The Far Left — Jim @ 21:36
6 Comments »

Don’t Let The Door Hit You On The Way Out…

Good riddance. Ward “Little Eichmann” Churchill has been fired. He’s no longer on the payroll of University of Colorado. You might remember, Churchill is the far lefty professor who wrote an essay after 9-11 comparing the victims of 9-11 to Adolf Eichmann. Of course, this was but one of his many offenses. He’s been accused and found guilty of research misconduct, plagiarism, and falsification. I seem to remember there even being legitimate questions of whether or not he’s an American Indian as he claims, and whether or not he used that minority status to gain a position at the school.

Of course, as expected, Churchill has promised to sue the state. This will probably tie up the state and the University for years, and cost the tax payers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars. But, if we can finally be rid of this sorry excuse for a human being and the pain he’s caused then I guess it’s worth it.

7/23/2007

A Healthy Dose Of CYA

The Captain has a great post up on intel chief Mike McConnell and the left’s claims that he and the administration are engaging in fear-mongering regarding the threat that Al Qaida poses. The Captain pretty much echoes my thoughts on the matter. That being that they’re not fear-mongering, they’re playing CYA. Go read the whole thing.


Filed under: 9/11, GWOT, National Security — Jim @ 08:05
No Comments »

7/18/2007

Staying The Course…

That’s what Harry Reid and the Democrat freak show’s little publicity stunt was really about last night. Although, not in the manner you’re thinking. You see, the Democrats were advocating for an amendment that would dictate that our troops pull back to isolated bases, train the Iraqi security forces, and conduct occasional search and destroy missions. But, that’s what we were doing before the Senate voted unanimously to send General Petraeus to command the troops in Iraq, and before he instituted his – so far – successful COIN strategy. Of course, there are other problems with the amendment, the worst being that it is unconstitutional. The Senate doesn’t have the authority to dictate war strategy. They don’t even have the authority to dictate when the troops come home. The only thing they have the authority to do is cut off funding for the war, and our troops in the field.

Also, in regards to the little publicity stunt / pajama party last night, Senator McCain gave an excellent speech about what’s at stake right now. Here’s the money quote:

Mr. President, we have nearly finished this little exhibition, which was staged, I assume, for the benefit of a briefly amused press corps and in deference to political activists opposed to the war who have come to expect from Congress such gestures, empty though they may be, as proof that the majority in the Senate has heard their demands for action to end the war in Iraq. The outcome of this debate, the vote we are about to take, has never been in doubt to a single member of this body. And to state the obvious, nothing we have done for the last twenty-four hours will have changed any facts on the ground in Iraq or made the outcome of the war any more or less important to the security of our country. The stakes in this war remain as high today as they were yesterday; the consequences of an American defeat are just as grave; the costs of success just as dear. No battle will have been won or lost, no enemy will have been captured or killed, no ground will have been taken or surrendered, no soldier will have survived or been wounded, died or come home because we spent an entire night delivering our poll-tested message points, spinning our soundbites, arguing with each other, and substituting our amateur theatrics for statesmanship. All we have achieved are remarkably similar newspaper accounts of our inflated sense of the drama of this display and our own temporary physical fatigue. Tomorrow the press will move on to other things and we will be better rested. But nothing else will have changed.

In Iraq, American soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen are still fighting bravely and tenaciously in battles that are as dangerous, difficult and consequential as the great battles of our armed forces’ storied past. Our enemies will still be intent on defeating us, and using our defeat to encourage their followers in the jihad they wage against us, a war which will become a greater threat to us should we quit the central battlefield in defeat. The Middle East will still be a tinderbox, which our defeat could ignite in a regional war that will imperil our vital interests at risk there and draw us into a longer and far more costly war. The prospect of genocide in Iraq, in which we will be morally complicit, is still as real a consequence of our withdrawal today as it was yesterday.

Hat Tip: Captains Quarters

7/17/2007

What A Class Act

Displaying the (lack of) class that her website is so well known for, Arianna Huffington has decided to publish some of the details of a cell phone call between Bill Kristol and an unknown caller she supposedly overheard on the Amtrak from New York to DC the other day. Aside from the fact that it’s rather rude to not only listen in but then publish those details. Arianna – according to Michael Goldfarb – also got the details of the call wrong. But, no matter, her intent was to use this supposed phone call to beat Bill Kristol and President Bush over the head about the Iraq war.

Also unfortunate is the fact that she can’t even get the facts on the ground in Iraq right. Of course, that’s really no big surprise either considering this is all coming from someone who is more interested in George Bush’s defeat that the country’s victory in Iraq. You see, that’s something that has really made me mad about Democrats lately; they seem more interested in defeating George Bush than defeating Al Qaeda and Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Cross posted @ The Daily Blogster

7/13/2007

Beauty, Strength, And Power

The USS Truman found her way on to the pages of the WSJ today in a piece by Bret Stephens. This story is not just about the Truman though, it’s about the courage and dedication of the 5,000 or so sailors that make her what she is.

Of the sailors I meet, some are here to make a better life; others, a different life. Paige Young, 20, joined the Navy mainly “to get out of my town” of Gillette, Wyo. What surprises her most about Navy life? “The diversity of people,” she says. She now works flight ops from the bridge. David Andre, an enlisted man in his early 30s, holds a master’s degree in international relations. He joined for a taste of military life and now wants to apply for the officers’ course. Cynthia Trammel, 22, had wanted to join the Navy ever since her father took her to air shows of the Blue Angels. She’s responsible for an inconspicuous Gatling gun at the ship’s stern that can fire 20mm tungsten rounds at a rate of 4,500 a minute against incoming missiles. “I’ve nicknamed her ‘Myrtle,’ ” Ms. Trammel tells me. “She is demanding.”

The Navy operates 11 carriers like the Truman. No other navy in the world comes close. The Chinese, who would love to have one or more carriers of their own, recently sent their top admiral for a tour of the Truman. Adm. Gortney recalls that the Chinese were mainly interested in two things. The first was the ship’s arresting gear, the heavy cables that trap landing planes. The second was the way the Navy recruits, trains, organizes and motivates its sailors.

No doubt the Chinese will one day figure out the mechanics of landing planes at sea–and of catapulting them off the deck. I wonder if they’ll ever get the human element right. The men and women of the Truman are here as a matter of their own free will in order to defend our collective right to live freely. That’s more than a matter of mechanics. It’s a matter of spirit: the true source of the Truman’s awesome power, and of its beauty, too.


Filed under: Military, National Security — Jim @ 17:15
No Comments »

Regarding Iraq…

I woke up early this morning because I’ve got something resting heavy on my heart. What could cause someone who usually doesn’t rise until 8 AM — and even at that point one would be hard pressed to call me a morning person — to wake up at 4:30? It’s the tremendous moral cowardice of our elected officials. You see, in case you haven’t heard, according to our elected officials in congress the surge has failed. Yesterday, the house voted to begin withdrawal of our troops within 120 days. The withdrawal is to be completed by April of 2008.

Here’s the problem with all of this; the claim that the surge has failed isn’t supported by the facts on the ground. Al Anbar is well on its way to being pacified, Ramadi is quiet, Baghdad has quieted down, and the “Baghdad belts” are being pacified as we speak. What’s even more amazing is that this progress has been made, and the full number of surge troops have only been in place since June 15th. Rep. John Shadegg from Arizona made a speech on the floor yesterday saying that the bill is about politics.

First, it is a purely political document, hopelessly vague and meaningless. Let me explain why. The bill turns on two key terms. One, that the United States transition to a ‘limited presence’ in Iraq within the next 120 days; and, two, that the President provide a justification of the ‘minimum force levels required to protect the United States’ national security interests in Iraq.’

While I am pleased that the authors recognize that we are in Iraq to protect our national security interests, again, the legislation is hopelessly vague and therefore meaningless. Neither of these two key terms, ‘limited presence’ and ‘minimum force level required to protect U.S. national security interests,’ is defined. Oh, the bill has a definition section and other terms are defined, but ‘limited presence’ and ‘minimum force level required to protect U.S. national security interests’ aren’t defined. …

The Chairman of the Armed Services Committee knows exactly why these terms are not defined, and indeed the Democratic Leadership knows why these terms are not defined. They are not defined because they need ambiguity. Indeed, ambiguity in this legislation is essential to its passage. They know that they can’t agree on what the meanings of these terms are. You see, if they defined ‘limited presence’ as too many troops, then their most liberal, most antiwar Members would not vote for the legislation. They couldn’t. And, if they defined limited presence too low, then their Blue Dog Members would not support the bill. Again, this bill is about beating up on the President and about scaring nervous Members of Congress.

What would this country be like if Congress had shown this kind of cowardice during WW II? What language would we be speaking if Congress had ordered the withdrawal of troops shortly after they began making headway in France in the bloody days immediately following D-day?

As I said above, all of the surge troops have only been in place since June 15th. Some of them have only just begun to conduct combat operations. Let’s stop cutting the legs out from underneath our troops, and give them time to do their job.

7/11/2007

Flying In A Plane Is One Thing, But This?

I’m not a big fan of flying. I never have been, and my dislike of flying has only grown since 9-11. So, I was amazed this morning when I surfed over to FOX News and saw this.

BEND, Ore. — Last weekend, Kent Couch settled down in his lawn chair with some snacks — and a parachute. Attached to his lawn chair were 105 large helium balloons.

Destination: Idaho.

With instruments to measure his altitude and speed, a global positioning system device in his pocket, and about four plastic bags holding five gallons of water each to act as ballast — he could turn a spigot, release water and rise — Couch headed into the Oregon sky.

Nearly nine hours later, the 47-year-old gas station owner came back to earth in a farmer’s field near Union, short of Idaho but about 193 miles from home.

“When you’re a little kid and you’re holding a helium balloon, it has to cross your mind,” Couch told the Bend Bulletin.

Yeah, sure, it crossed my mind, but… It sure is a long way to the ground, and there’s not a whole lot there in that lawn chair to protect you. In fact there’s nothing there to protect you.


Filed under: General — Jim @ 07:36
1 Comment »

7/6/2007

Clarity

In today’s Opinion Journal, Senator Joe Lieberman speaks with clarity about the situation in the middle east as it relates to Iran. There is more and more evidence every day that Iran is actively using it’s proxies to kill American’s and our allies in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Senator Lieberman rightly points out that it’s time to set aside our political differences and send a clear message to Tehran that they cannot get away with attacking the US and our allies. Here’s the key ‘graph.

The threat posed by Iran to our soldiers’ lives, our security as a nation and our allies in the Middle East is a truth that cannot be wished or waved away. It must be confronted head-on. The regime in Iran is betting that our political disunity in Washington will constrain us in responding to its attacks. For the sake of our nation’s security, we must unite and prove them wrong.

Go read the whole thing…


Filed under: Afghanistan, GWOT, Iran, Iraq, Military, Politics — Jim @ 06:12
3 Comments »

7/5/2007

What A Great Way To Spend Independence Day

Wow, and here I thought I had a great day yesterday. These soldiers had an even better one I would imagine. 600 of them re-enlisted in one of the largest re-enlistment ceremonies ever held, and 161 of them became U.S. citizens. Here’s the story from DefenseLink.

Nearly 600 U.S. Troops Re-enlist in Baghdad on Independence Day
By Marine Sgt. Jess Kent
American Forces Press Service

BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 4, 2007 – Hundreds of troops gathered at Al Faw Palace for the Multi-National Force-Iraq Reenlistment, Naturalization and Independence Day Ceremony today at Camp Victory. During the ceremony, 588 troops reenlisted and 161 were naturalized as American citizens.

Army Gen. David Petraeus, commanding general, MNF-I, gave opening remarks before administering the Oath of Enlistment.”This morning we pay tribute to the American ideals we all hold so dear in several significant ways,” he said.

“First, by conducting what surely is the largest reenlistment event ever held in Iraq and perhaps in our Armed Forces’ history, then by celebrating the granting of American citizenship to a group of troopers who have already pledged their loyalty to our nation by putting their lives on the line for it, and finally by observing the 231st birthday of our great country,” he said.

Petraeus said the troops who reenlisted on Independence Day, most while serving on a second or third deployment to a combat zone, have made a decision based on far more than any bonus they may receive.

“No bonus, no matter the size, can adequately compensate you for the contribution each of you has made and continues to make as a custodian of our nation’s defenses,” he said. “Nor can any amount of money compensate you adequately for the sacrifices you make serving here in Iraq or the burdens your loved ones face at home in your absence. And we certainly cannot put a price on the freedoms you defend or those we are trying to help the Iraqis establish and safeguard here in the land of the two rivers.”

Petraeus then dedicated the Independence Day ceremony in honor of two soldiers who died fighting for America before they could be sworn in as citizens.

“Sgt. Kimel Watt and Spc. Farid Elazzouzi, who would have been in your ranks here this morning, were lost in recent combat action, giving the last full measure of devotion for a country that would have become fully theirs today,” Petraeus said. “Words can not express the admiration I feel for these two men or the sadness I feel for our nation’s loss and their families’ sacrifice.”

Petraeus said the deaths are reminders that freedom comes at a very high cost, which must never be forgotten. Like these two soldiers, who fought and died with the American flag on their shoulders, he said the troops being naturalized as U.S. citizens were most deserving.

“When you enlisted into the Armed Forces you swore to support and defend a Constitution that did not yet fully apply to you,” Petraeus said. “You chose to endure the same sacrifices as your fellow comrades in arms to preserve the freedom of a land that was not yet fully yours. You accepted that you might have to pay the ultimate price on behalf of a nation to which you did not fully belong. Now, you will officially become citizens of the United States, a country to which each of you has already borne true faith and allegiance in your hearts and your deeds.”…

Hat Tip: Blackfive


Filed under: GWOT, Iraq, Military — Jim @ 10:42
No Comments »

7/3/2007

That’ll Make The left Mad

Well, I’m glad to hear that President Bush commuted Scooter Libby’s sentence. As I’ve pointed out before, I don’t think he should have been tried in the first place. Once Fitzgerald found out who leaked Plame’s identity — and that it wasn’t Scooter Libby – it should have all been over as far as Libby was concerned. Never mind the fact that Plame didn’t meet the definition of a covert agent as described in the applicable law. My only complaint was that he didn’t outright pardon him. Nothing the President does will please the left at this point, so there’s no sense in worrying about what they’re saying. Besides, a party that defends a President who perjured himself in front of a grand jury, pardoned his own brother who had been convicted on federal drug charges, pardoned FALN terrorists so that his wife could pander her way into a Senate seat, and pardoned a number of other assorted low lifes doesn’t really have any room to complain.


Filed under: Plame / Libby, Politics — Jim @ 19:21
2 Comments »

7/1/2007

The Enemy We Face

The enemy we face in Iraq and Afghanistan is relentless and evil. In his latest dispatch (Caution: Gruesome pictures) Michael Yon tells us about a trip he took into a local Iraqi village that had been taken over by Al Qaeda and what Al Qaeda did to the residents of that village. This enemy… these evil bastards must be eliminated, because I do not ever want to see this kind of terrorism and brutality come to our country.

Cross posted @ The Daily Blogster


Filed under: GWOT, Iraq — Jim @ 11:01
3 Comments »