The Dems in Washington are doing their best to divorce the war in Iraq from the overall war on terror.

The House Armed Services Committee is banishing the global war on terror from the 2008 defense budget.

This is not because the war has been won, lost or even called off, but because the committee’s Democratic leadership doesn’t like the phrase.

A memo for the committee staff, circulated March 27, says the 2008 bill and its accompanying explanatory report that will set defense policy should be specific about military operations and “avoid using colloquialisms.”

The “global war on terror,” a phrase first used by President Bush shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., should not be used, according to the memo. Also banned is the phrase the “long war,” which military officials began using last year as a way of acknowledging that military operations against terrorist states and organizations would not be wrapped up in a few years.

Committee staff members are told in the memo to use specific references to specific operations instead of the Bush administration’s catch phrases. The memo, written by Staff Director Erin Conaton, provides examples of acceptable phrases, such as “the war in Iraq,” the “war in Afghanistan, “operations in the Horn of Africa” or “ongoing military operations throughout the world.”

Do they really think that by using a different term they will be able to change reality? The war in Iraq — according to our enemies — is inseperable from the war on terror. Why does the opposition think that that can be changed with semantics?

 Hat Tip: Guy @ GeezervilleUSA

UPDATE: Here’s the link to the committee memo 

1. 

   PCBS, in the extreme.

   Comment by Jenn — 4/4/2007 @ 12:52

   ---

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackback URI for this post:
http://thinking-right.com/2007/04/04/dems-trying-to-divorce-iraq-from-gwot/trackback/